What We Do
The Centre for Competition Law and Economics (CCLE) at Stellenbosch University promotes research and teaching related to competition policy in South Africa and beyond. The CCLE team consists of economics and legal faculty, doctoral students, post-doctoral fellows, student and part-time researchers and academic associates from across the globe.
The Centre was established as a research unit within the Department of Economics at Stellenbosch University, with seed funding from the South African Competition Commission.
Upcoming Events
Event Type :
Workshop
Workshop
All
Practice Webinar
Event Details
This paper examines the South African Competition Tribunal’s decision in MIH/WeBuyCars, the first digital merger prohibited on potential competition grounds in South Africa. The case is best understood as
Event Details
This paper examines the South African Competition Tribunal’s decision in MIH/WeBuyCars, the
first digital merger prohibited on potential competition grounds in South Africa. The case is best
understood as a reverse killer acquisition, whether the acquirer is considered a potential competitor
of the target. The paper studies challenges in establishing the likelihood of entry, focusing on (1) the
limits of a factual inquiry, (2) the benefits and limitations of the dynamic capabilities framework,
and (3) the distinction between capability and incentive to enter. It also considers the implication of
a policy preference for entry-driven innovation over integration-driven efficiencies for the potential
competition assessment. Post-prohibition outcomes in this case, where no entry has occurred and
merger efficiencies are foregone, illustrate the risk of false positives for theories of mergers harm
focused on potential competition.
Speaker
Prof. Willem Boshoff and Katherine Stainton
Time
(Wednesday) 1:10 pm - 2:00 pm CAT
Location
Microsoft Teams
Organizer
Katherine Stainton24707058@sun.ac.za
Event Details
While State aid measures are known to have the potential to distort competition, many forms of aid are nevertheless permitted where their benefits outweigh such distortions. State aid may be
Event Details
While State aid measures are known to have the potential to distort competition, many forms of aid are nevertheless permitted where their benefits outweigh such distortions. State aid may be granted through a variety of instruments, some of which may be more distortive than others.This Article examines whether the way in which Covid support is granted, impacts firm outcomes once the GGE is accounted for. We link COVID-19-labelled State aid from the Commission’s State Aid Transparency database to accounting data for large-enterprise beneficiaries across 24 Member States (2020–2023), which results in 28 969 disbursement–firm observations. Using controlled regressions and a staggered, synthetic difference-in-differences design while conditioning on the aid element, we estimate the differential effect of grants versus other instruments. Grants are associated with a marked short-term strengthening of profitability and balance-sheet indicators (mainly profit margins, ROA, solvency indicators, and interest coverage), but these advantages dissipate and do not translate into consistently higher medium-term growth or efficiency relative to the controls, supported through other aid instruments.
Speaker
Dr. Seppe Maes
Time
(Wednesday) 1:10 pm - 2:00 pm
Event Details
The business and strategic management literature shows that dynamic competition depends on firm-level capabilities. Yet, firm-level capabilities do not feature in the variables used in the economic evaluation of mergers.
Event Details
The business and strategic management literature shows that dynamic competition depends on firm-level capabilities. Yet, firm-level capabilities do not feature in the variables used in the economic evaluation of mergers. For that reason, integrating capabilities analysis in merger policy is often perceived as a challenge. This paper questions that perception. We examine whether competition agencies already conduct capabilities analyses in merger enforcement, focusing on purchaser approval decisions following divestiture orders. Using a unique dataset of 109 such decisions adopted by the European Commission between 2014 and 2025, we find that the Commission conducts some capability analysis in two-thirds of cases, with thorough examinations occurring in one-third. The intensity of this analysis varies substantially by industry: it is high in pharmaceuticals and chemicals but low or absent in basic metals, electrical equipment, and retail. When capabilities are analyzed, the Commission focuses overwhelmingly on post-merger integration capabilities, with other capabilities like R&D and scaling receiving comparatively less attention. Furthermore, the Commission rarely rejects proposed purchasers on capability grounds. The results hold across the entire relevant period. We discuss the implications for merger remedy design and dynamic competition policy.
Speaker
Dr. Selçukhan Ünekbaş
Time
(Wednesday) 1:10 pm - 2:00 pm
Latest News
The CCLE is Hiring!
2026-05-13T20:22:11+02:00May 13th, 2026|Categories: News|
The Centre for Competition Law and Economics (CCLE) at Stellenbosch [...]
ERSA Conference: Shaping Digital Competition Policy and Regulation in South Africa
2026-03-30T12:38:50+02:00March 30th, 2026|Categories: News|
The CCLE was delighted to take part in the ERSA [...]
Workshop on Data-Related Remedies in Digital Platform Markets
2026-03-13T12:30:28+02:00November 18th, 2025|Categories: News|
The Centre for Competition Law and Economics (CCLE) and the [...]
Upcoming Workshop on Data-Related Remedies in Digital Platform Markets
2026-03-30T12:41:23+02:00November 6th, 2025|Categories: News|
Next week, the Centre for Competition Law and Economics (CCLE) [...]